Ministry of Housing and Urban Ministry recently issued three documents, low-rent housing to allow the completion of tasks around the premise
of the net 10% of the land transfer, provision of low-cost housing fund value-added security funds and the financing of special subsidies for
low-rent housing guarantee
Gold, for the development of public rental. (News Playback: 22 cities in less extraction of low-rent housing guarantee payments over 14.6
billion)
How to achieve "Home Ownership?" Over the years, the global prevalence of the practice of developed countries and regions, the basic same -
money, playing high-priced real estate; how little or no money, and live in government subsidized housing.
In France, all municipalities must ensure that more than 20% of housing is low-rent housing; in Singapore, 87% of the country's public
housing residents to move from the Government; in Hong Kong, about one third of the population provided by the Government rental
Public house. Therefore, promoting the public rental (low-rent housing) system, one can suppress housing prices; the second is to maximize
the "Home Ownership", maintaining social harmony and stability. Therefore, developed countries the public rental system is
And regions as a social "chief regulator."
Ministry of Housing and Urban below the three ministries to allow land transfer fees can be 10% of net income of public rental reconstruction
to alleviate the problems of capital and the development of public rental, I am afraid that this provision is only a "Huabing" bang fudge and
Has been.
Renting is fit to develop public opinion. Last November, China Youth Daily, a network of 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities)
12,328 people to a survey, 95.1% of people in support of public rental housing across the country
More than a third of people think that public rental "will make more people to rent rather than buy a house." But the question is, local
government purchases, new construction, renovation, lease of public rental housing have the enthusiasm?
NPC Standing Committee in October last year, a report data show that the central budgetary arrangements in the major public investment
projects, the national security of the slow progress of housing construction, as of the end of August 2009 was only 23.6% completed
Less than 1 / 4. 10% of net land low-rent housing, which in 2007 the Ministry of Finance issued the "low-rent housing guarantee fund
management approach", the requirement clearly. But in March this year, the country held "two sessions", all
National People's Congress Li Yongzhong "prick," says: According to regulations, 10% of land transfer to be used for low-cost housing
construction, should be 127.329 billion yuan last year, but actually spending only 70.852 billion yuan. That is, this the
The construction of low-rent housing for more than 560 billion yuan by local governments moved away. Guangdong, which is less than the
proportion of investment by 0.6%, and 10% are far apart.
Statutory protection for the construction of low-rent housing payments, yet it nearly half as he was moved; the central allocation of special
funds, but also less than excited, to mobilize local government protection of housing construction progress on schedule, how to live one of
three departments such as the Ministry building
Were floating in the "red tape", what is the extent of the deterrent force and binding? An "allow", "may" and its lack of rigid and flexible
for more than a "rule", destined to become a "feather" rather than "authority arrow," the fate of
. Ensure that the land revenue benefit of the people, the key is added in the policy strict accountability procedures. There is no
accountability, policies and regulations can only be a useless empty paper text.
National Audit Office announced on the 17th of 19 provinces from 2007 to 2009 audit of government investment in affordable housing survey
results, showing 1.5 billion low-cost housing security payments were misappropriated. The construction of low-rent housing are paying the
money was misappropriated, but also
Land income they expect to spend money in the construction of public rental it?